Read

84.4% of Cancer Patients Taking Ivermectin + Mebendazole Reported No Evidence of Disease, Tumor Regression, or Cancer Stabilization After 6 Months

  • Independent News Roundup By Independent News Roundup
  • Apr 16, 2026

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher breaks down the findings on Real America’s Voice

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

I joined Steve Gruber on Real America’s Voice to break down what is now the largest real-world human analysis of ivermectin and mebendazole in cancer patients.

BREAKING: Largest Real-World Analysis of Ivermectin + Mebendazole in Cancer Patients Shows 84.4% Clinical Benefit — Nearly HALF Report Cancer Disappearance or Regression

BREAKING: Largest Real-World Analysis of Ivermectin + Mebendazole in Cancer Patients Shows 84.4% Clinical Benefit — Nearly HALF Report Cancer Disappearance or Regression

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH·8 Apr Read full story

84.4% of the cancer patients taking ivermectin + mebendazole reported no evidence of disease, tumor regression, or cancer stabilization after 6 months.

That kind of signal doesn’t happen randomly. The key question is not just what we observed, but why.

There are now hundreds of preclinical studies—in both cell systems and animal models—showing that antiparasitic agents like ivermectin and mebendazole exert broad, multi-target anti-cancer effects across more than a dozen tumor types.

NEW STUDY – Ivermectin Shows Striking Anticancer Potential and Remarkable Safety

NEW STUDY – Ivermectin Shows Striking Anticancer Potential and Remarkable Safety

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH·23 April 2025 Read full story

In other words, the clinical signal we observed is not surprising. It is biologically coherent. Three mechanisms stand out as central:

First, ivermectin appears to target cancer stem cells—the small, highly resistant population of cells that drive recurrence and metastasis. Most conventional therapies fail to eliminate these cells. You can shrink a tumor, but if the stem cells remain, the cancer often comes back. Laboratory data suggest ivermectin disrupts this root system.

Second, mebendazole interferes with microtubule formation, which is essential for cell division. When you disrupt microtubules, cancer cells lose their ability to replicate effectively. This creates a direct anti-proliferative effect.

Third, mebendazole also impacts tumor metabolism, particularly glucose utilization. Cancer cells are heavily dependent on glucose to fuel rapid growth. Limiting that pathway places them under significant metabolic stress.

When you see a clinical benefit signal of this magnitude, paired with a deep and consistent mechanistic foundation across hundreds of studies, it warrants serious attention.

Advancing this line of investigation is no longer optional. Prospective, randomized controlled trials are urgently warranted to validate these findings, define optimal treatment strategies, and determine the full clinical potential of this protocol.

This is not the end.

At the McCullough Foundation, we are committed to advancing this critical line of cancer research—work that should have begun decades ago. Our initial findings are just the beginning.

We are now expanding into larger studies and developing rigorously documented, clinically adjudicated case reports that capture complete remissions in detail. This next phase is essential to move from signal to undeniable evidence.

But this work takes time, precision, and significant resources.


If you believe in accelerating truly innovative, independent cancer research, please consider supporting the McCullough Foundation. Your support directly fuels the studies, analyses, and clinical documentation needed to bring these findings to the world: https://mcculloughfnd.org/products/donate-1

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Epidemiologist and Foundation Administrator, McCullough Foundation

Support our mission: mcculloughfnd.org

Health
Science
Interview
Avatar