By Independent News Roundup
Tennessee is the third state to see a version of the Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act introduced. American Patriot, Tennessee State Senator Janice Bowling introduced the ‘mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act’ (SB 1949) into the Tennessee legislature. The bill classifies mRNA as Weapons of Mass Destruction. Tennessee is now the third state to have a version of the bill introduced. American Patriot Rachel Jones Keshel introduced the Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act into the Arizona Legislature recently. Previously, American Patriot Shane Mekeland introduced the mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act into the Minnesota State legislature.
The TN bill lacked a co sponsor in the House and will not move forward until next year. Senator Bowling intends to reintroduce it next year. The bill is part of a multi state effort to stop the distribution of mRNA biological and technological weapons of mass destruction targeting American citizens. The proposed historic legislation is unique as it recognizes that mRNA injections and products are already illegal according to existing state biological weapon, weapon of mass destruction, or terrorism laws. The bill also creates a criminal and civil liability for non enforcement.
Dr. Joseph Sansone who drafted 50 state versions of the bill is a psychotherapist, who is litigating in Florida to stop Governor DeSantis from continuing to facilitate mRNA biological and technological weapons of mass destruction in the state, has filed 11 expert affidavits with the Court, including an affidavit from the late Dr. Francis Boyle, considered by many to have been the world’s leading legal authority on biological weapons. Dr. Boyle drafted the United States domestic implementation legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention called the Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act of 1989, which passed both houses of Congress unanimously, clearly stated that the mRNA nanoparticle injections violated the law he wrote.
Affidavits were also obtained from Dr. Ana Mihalcea, Karen Kingston, Dr. Andrew Zywiec, Nic Hulsher, Dr. Marivic Villa, Dr. Ben Marble, Dr. Paul Alexander, Dr. Rima Laibow, Richard Hirschman, Dr. Avary Brinkley, and Dr. Ben Marble.
A recent peer reviewed journal article published in the American Journal of Physicians and Surgeons titled COVID 19 Harms and Damages: A Non Exhaustive Conclusion, also asserted that the COVID ‘vaccine’ violated the Biological Weapons Convention.
The World Council for Health, Florida, also recently endorsed the ‘Sansone mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act’ and declared mRNA nanoparticle injections biological and technological weapons of mass destruction.
Get this bill introduced in your state!
50 State Versions of the ‘Sansone MRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act’.
Track the Tennessee mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act here.
Full Text of Tennessee mRNA Bioweapon Prohibition Act Here.
Screen Shot Below:
GiveSendGo to support my case.
.svg){kind=logo}
This week, Tennessee became the third U.S. state to introduce legislation classifying mRNA injections and products as biological or technological weapons of mass destruction under existing state law.
The mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act, introduced by State Senator Janice Bowling, follows similar bills already tabled in Arizona and Minnesota. The legislation argues that mRNA technologies already fall within the scope of existing biological weapons and terrorism statutes, and that governments have a duty to enforce those laws — not ignore them.
What makes this significant isn’t whether the bill passes this year or next.
It’s the fact that lawmakers are finally asking questions governments elsewhere refuse to ask.
The bill’s architect, Dr. Joseph Sansone, has submitted expert affidavits — including one from the late Dr. Francis Boyle, the legal architect of the U.S. Biological Weapons Convention legislation — asserting that mRNA nanoparticle injections violate existing bioweapons law. The bill also introduces criminal and civil liability for non-enforcement, something virtually unheard of in public health legislation.
Meanwhile in New Zealand, there has been:
• No parliamentary inquiry
• No independent legal review
• No reassessment of biological weapons obligations
• No accountability for long-term harm
Our government simply declared the debate “over”.
If U.S. states can examine whether emergency medical technologies breached biological weapons conventions, why is New Zealand unwilling even to look?
This isn’t about politics.
It’s about law, sovereignty, and public safety.
New Zealand once led the world on nuclear weapons.
Why are we now silent on biological ones?