Read

Leaders Around the World Have at Least Committed in Unison Criminal Negligence — At Worst, a Pre-Textual Governance Ushering in a New Global Architecture

  • Independent News Roundup By Independent News Roundup
  • May 25, 2025

Digital ID, Centralized Bank Currencies, Controlled Speech, Mass surveillance, Social Credit Controls...

By Independent News Roundup

In the annals of modern history, few events have reshaped the democratic landscape as radically—and as destructively—as the global governmental response to COVID-19. What began as a health emergency quickly evolved into a test case for centralized authority, narrative control, and supranational governance.

From Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand to Justin Trudeau in Canada, Emmanuel Macron in France, Joe Biden in the U.S., Boris Johnson in the UK, Mark Rutte in the Netherlands, and Angela Merkel in Germany, we witnessed the synchronized collapse of constitutional norms, civil liberties, and economic self-determination. This was not organic evolution. It was execution of a coordinated political and economic doctrine.

At the very least, this constitutes criminal negligence. At worst, it was a pretextual restructuring of governance and sovereignty—ushered in through globalist frameworks led by the World Economic Forum (WEF), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations (UN), International Monetary Fund (IMF), and increasingly, the European Union (EU).

The Damage Is Tangible—and Global

The costs are not abstract. Millions have lost jobs, homes, businesses, and lives—not from a virus, but from the responses to it. Suicide rates have climbed. Economic depression grips families. Vaccine injuries and excess mortality mount with little official recognition. Small businesses were decimated while multinational conglomerates flourished under government protection.

In New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern's administration enforced some of the harshest mandates in the world, enforcing digital surveillance, vaccine passports, and information censorship. Her infamous declaration—“We will continue to be your single source of truth”—epitomizes the authoritarian creep that emerged globally.

The Policy Blueprint Was Global, Not National

We must reject the idea that these decisions were made independently or uniquely. The policy playbook—lockdowns, emergency powers, stimulus-fueled inflation, speech suppression—was almost identical across dozens of nations.

This was not leadership. This was compliance with a centralized ideological regime, disseminated through global networks like the WEF, WHO, and EU commission structures, with help from corporate media, big tech, and unelected think tanks.

Consider:

  • Global lockdowns regardless of local context.

  • Near-identical rollout of vaccine mandates and digital IDs.

  • Simultaneous suppression of early treatments and scientific dissent.

  • Central bank monetary policies flooding markets with debt, not prosperity.

  • Coordinated “disinformation” legislation used to criminalize free speech.

  • The normalization of corporate-government censorship partnerships.

This level of coordination does not reflect democratic pluralism. It reflects a shift toward post-democratic governance—a form of rule by managerial elite, not by the people.

The Emergence of a New Governance Architecture

In the wake of these events, we are seeing a deeper transformation:

  • Digital currencies and identity systems, trialed during the pandemic, are being formalized for peacetime control.

  • Borderless trade policies favor corporations while domestic economies collapse.

  • Censorship is becoming legal infrastructure, not emergency overreach.

  • Net zero climate goals are being used as pretexts to ration mobility, consumption, and private property—without democratic consent.

This “new normal” is not about public health, climate, or security. It is about resetting power—political, economic, and cultural—into the hands of transnational institutions and their unelected stewards.

Conclusion: The Case for Rebuilding Sovereignty and Freedom

To restore balance, the global pendulum must swing back—not into extremism, but into foundational principles of liberty, sovereignty, and decentralization.

We must:

  • Reinstate freedom of speech as the cornerstone of civil society—without exception, platform manipulation, or legal ambiguity.

  • Reassert national borders and economic isolationism—not to retreat, but to protect cultural and economic identity.

  • Return to polycentric currency systems and build cross-border payment networks immune to weaponization (e.g., BRICS' alternatives to SWIFT).

  • Ban usury and hyper-financialization, which have enslaved generations through debt-based economies.

  • Guarantee energy security for each nation—independent from weaponized international climate deals or cartel pricing.

  • Dismantle supranational structures that usurp democratic accountability.

This model—embraced by parts of the Global South, BRICS nations, and growing independence movements—is not regression. It is resilience.

If the last five years taught us anything, it’s that coordinated governance without democratic checks becomes tyranny—whether cloaked in science, crisis, or compassion.

It is time for nations—and citizens—to choose their future consciously. To exit the architecture of control. To reclaim self-rule.

Because the line between negligence and malice was crossed. And unless it is pushed back, the next crisis will not be met with resistance. It will be met with obedience.

Opinion
Geopolitics
Avatar