The submissions deadline of the Royal Commission on Covid-19 Phase 2 has passed and thanks to everyone, 31,000 have had their say. Special thanks for VFF and NZDSOS who spearheaded efforts to alert people, encourage and facilitate submissions. I am sure you are all joining in with a sense of relief and achievement. You are probably also feeling you need a break from the constant concern that has wrapped itself around us all for five years.
There follows a period of analysis, reflection and public hearings. The chairman, Grant Illingworth KC, has assured us that the Commission will be “looking into the issues that are raised by people, with an impartial and independent approach.” Over the coming weeks and months they will be sifting through wildly conflicting evidence and “deciding which parts of that evidence are reliable and which parts are unreliable.” A daunting task considering the near total polarisation of opinions that has taken root during the pandemic. Those called to give evidence at public hearings, zoom conferences and through correspondence will play a crucial role in highlighting key data and studies as well as pointing out the extent of injury, misconceptions and misrepresentations.
The conclusions of the Royal Commission are still a whole year away and uncertain. We are also aware that we are facing issues across a very broad front that goes way beyond the remit of the Commission. If passed, the Gene Technology Bill appears ready to open the flood gates to the ubiquitous use of gene technology in all walks of life. Accelerating a process that is already happening under the radar, replacing everyday foods and medicines with imperfect and contaminated genetic copies and/or synthetic substitutes. The lack of any accompanying labelling provision is criminally dismissive of our rights. This is part of a global process, with the NZ government apparently seeking to lead the way.
We don’t want to win the fight but lose the war.
My experience of advocating against biotechnology experimentation for forty years has taught me that we are not in a conventional argument governed by logic, reason or experience. Advocates of biotechnology do not suddenly disappear, even if they lose one round, they come back at you harder in the next. Frightening though it sounds, we don’t want to wrest a hard won promise from the government to ban vaccine mandates, to suddenly find they are spraying us from the air or building it into our food (something that is already being designed in research labs under the umbrella of ‘enhanced nutritional value’).
Searching for a metaphor, at first I thought this is a David and Goliath conflict. But I realised this conflict is nothing like that unequal contest. It is being fought in the realm of genetics, a subtle field of existence at the far edge of perception, but close to the heart of natural law. This is not a realm open to direct view. Such a conflict can only be won by unconventional, almost roundabout means.
To be heard and prevail, we need to understand and educate ourselves how to become more influential and powerful. To do this, we need to understand the foundational organising principles of natural law at work in our own life, in society and in nature. Today we can see very clearly that the abstract yet concrete understanding of natural law in its totality is much needed in the modern world, where the parts of life have become so distracting that we have lost touch with the WHOLENESS.
30th April 2025 Founding Day
If you attended the annual meeting of NZDSOS in Auckland two years ago you will remember that I presented the idea of founding an educational organisation, a college of natural law. This suggestion was met with a sustained burst of applause. During the ensuing twenty four months we have become aware of how much genetic modification has engulfed our lives to the detriment of our health, whether it is through the engineered virus, the vaccine or the genetically altered food now appearing on our dinner plates. Public health has become a crisis point in every country. Adding to this, governments are proposing to deregulate biotechnology, a suicidal course of action.
It seems people have lost sight of the rule of nature which maintains stability and progress. Therefore there is a greater need now to found an international educational institution based on natural law. We need to begin to rediscover the deep principles and joys of the integrated nature of life which has two phases—inner consciousness and outer physical reality.
Today we are announcing the start of an initiative to found Hill Station College with a focus on waking up to the principles of natural law, health and consciousness. The guiding principles of the College are the universal laws of nature governing life everywhere. Natural law has a universal language. It is not limited to any one philosophy, creed or culture. Natural law is the essence of our life. Natural law is helpful to everyone and needs to be fully understood by everyone.
We would very much like to hear from those who wish to be involved in this project. Do not think of this educational endeavour as limited to New Zealand. We receive letters of support from many responsible people living overseas. We are in the midst of a global crisis, our response has to be global. We are proposing a global transformation through education in natural law. We look forward to unfolding more in the coming days and weeks and we look forward to hearing more from you.
Guy Hatchard PhD
Website: HatchardReport.com and https://GLOBE.GLOBAL
Home 094372012
Mob 022 636 7760
Skype Name: GuyHatchard
.svg){kind=logo}
By The Hatchard Report