By Independent News Roundup
Senator Johnson asks bluntly whether McCullough's position—that COVID-19 vaccines have caused widespread harm—is backed by science.
Dr. McCullough responds by pointing to what he claims is the most comprehensive autopsy study to date.
“I’m the senior author of the largest autopsy series published so far,” McCullough states.
McCullough explains:
The study involved a global review of post-vaccine autopsy cases.
An independent adjudication committee was used to analyze whether the deaths were caused by the vaccine.
The finding?
73.9% of the deaths studied were determined to be caused by the vaccine.
He attributes this data to a paper led by Dr. Hocher, the first author, who was physically present during the hearing.
While McCullough presents the findings as definitive, it’s worth noting:
These conclusions are heavily debated within the broader medical and scientific community.
Major health agencies (CDC, FDA, EMA) continue to assert that COVID-19 vaccines are overwhelmingly safe, with rare side effects.
Autopsy-based causality is complex and often contested.
This exchange reflects the ongoing tension between official public health narratives and dissenting scientific voices.
It also raises broader questions:
How should adverse events be measured and attributed?
What level of scrutiny is being applied to COVID-era medical interventions?
Who decides what qualifies as “disinformation” in the medical field?
This video captures a pivotal moment in the unfolding debate over vaccine safety, scientific transparency, and public accountability.
It’s not just about data—it’s about trust, censorship, and the future of medical discourse in democratic societies.
.svg){kind=logo}
